Correction of Military Records & Federal Litigation
Few firms have as much experience with the Board for Correction of Military Records. Over the last 5 decades, this firm has represented service members of all branches in all military matters before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, Coast Guard Board for Correction of Military Records, and service personnel command.
With the volume of experience we have, there is a good chance that we've dealt with an issue similar to the one you may be facing.
The Boards all have fairly similar internal regulations and procedures. The Army regulations, for instance, are at AR 15-185. The Air Force instruction is at AFI 36-2603. Regulations pertaining to the Board for Correction of Naval Records can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 32 C.F.R. Part 723. There is also an instruction at SECNAVINST 5420.193. The Coast Guard directive is COMDTINST 1071.1.
More board resources are available on our Military Law Resources page.
Call (757) 401-6365 for a free consultation with our experienced BCMR attorneys if you need to appear before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
Daniel Conway Partner
For the better part of the last decade, Mr. Conway has become a nationally recognized resource on military justice. Daniel Conway is a former Marine staff sergeant and captain. He is a proud graduate of the University of Texas at San Antonio and University of New Hampshire School of Law. Mr. Conway is recently a former President of the New Hampshire Bar Association Military Law Section and a current member of the DC Bar. Mr. Conway has also written a book on Military Crimes and Defenses that is near publication with a major ...Read More
Gary Myers Partner
Gary Myers is a former JAG officer and one of the most experienced civilian military defense counsel in the country. He attended the University of Delaware where he received his undergraduate degree in chemical engineering in 1965. Gary Myers served as president of his freshman, sophomore and junior classes and went on in his senior year to be president of the student body. Gary Myers then attended the Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law, and graduated in 1968. Gary Myers paid his way through law school by ...Read More
Brian Pristera Attorney
A Richmond, Virginia native, Mr. Pristera graduated from Virginia Commonwealth University with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. After spending some time as a DuPont engineer, specifically working on Kevlar manufacturing and ballistics applications, Mr. Pristera attended law school at the University of New Hampshire. On July 4, 2010, Mr. Pristera was commissioned in the U.S. Army in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps. Mr. Pristera spent almost six years on active duty. He spent just over three of those years in criminal defense, ...Read More
Joseph Galli Attorney
Originally from Portland, Maine, Mr. Galli attended Elmira College in New York on a four-year Army ROTC Scholarship. At Elmira, he double majored in Business Administration and Public Affairs. Mr. Galli graduated from Elmira College in 2009 with a Bachelor of Science degree and was Commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Army. Mr. Galli began his study of the law in 2009 at the University of New Hampshire School of Law. There, he focused on litigation and honed his advocacy skills as a member of the Advanced Trial ...Read More
The law basically permits the Secretary of a military department to correct any military record when necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice. The Secretary acts through the review boards.
The statute of limitations is ordinarily three years; however, the boards have the power to waive the statute of limitations. The boards can also authorize monetary payments where appropriate.
If you have already filed and are contemplating retaining counsel for a request for reconsideration, a free consultation is highly advisable. Ordinarily, the statute of limitations for requests for reconsideration is one year. The boards often demand new argument or new evidence.
Why You Need Experienced Legal Counsel
Having experienced counsel can be extremely beneficial. The various boards receive thousands of applications a year. Some of the boards have significant backlogs that result in some cases taking over a year to resolve.
A Freedom of Information Act Request several years ago revealed that:
- Navy BCNR members devote an average of less than 2 minutes to deciding each application
- Army BCMR members devote an average of less than 4 minutes to deciding each application
- The boards do not require their members to actually review the evidence
- The boards sometimes rely on summarized written recommendations from staff members before they vote
- Board members do not necessarily undergo specialized or detailed training. They are not always experts in the law
The implication, of course, is that experienced counsel must be able to distill your facts and arguments into a concise and simple to understand argument for relief.
When contesting unfavorable information before the boards for correction of military records, it is also important to understand their relationship to the federal courts.
Military Review Boards Are Subject to Review
For informational purposes, military review boards - like all other federal agencies - are subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act. The boards understand that the statute - 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) - permits reviewing courts to set aside agency actions, findings, and conclusions that are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.
The difficulty is that courts are "unusually" deferential to the review boards because those boards are given expansive discretion in arriving at decisions. Courts are often reluctant to get involved in routine, day-to-day, administrative decisions. This is why experienced counsel is so important to the review board process.
It is also well-accepted that "government officials must follow their own regulations, even if they are not compelled to have them at all." (See Bond v. US, 47 Fed. Cl. 641, 648 (2000). Experienced counsel with assist you contesting unfavorable information with perspective as to how courts will analyze the issues.
The law requires that the review board "provide an explanation that will enable the court to evaluate the agency's rationale at the time of the decision." Often, the boards are deficient in providing their rationale.
There are other common ways in which review boards are prone to make errors. For those reasons, our free consultation is advisable before applying to the boards for correction of military records.
Schedule your free initial consultation with our BCMR attorneys today by calling (757) 401-6365.
Frequent Coverage on High-Profile Media Networks
Practicing Worldwide With Years of Combined Legal Experience
Fast Responses & Free Initial Consultations Available 24 Hours
Court-Martial Experience in Every Service & Every Crime