Defending Military Members
Worldwide Since 1973

BCMR Attorneys

Correction of Military Records & Federal Litigation

Few firms have as much experience with the Board for Correction of Military Records. Over the last 5 decades, this firm has represented service members of all branches in all military matters before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, Coast Guard Board for Correction of Military Records, and service personnel command.

With the volume of experience we have, there is a good chance that we've dealt with an issue similar to the one you may be facing.

The Boards all have fairly similar internal regulations and procedures. The Army regulations, for instance, are at AR 15-185. The Air Force instruction is at AFI 36-2603. Regulations pertaining to the Board for Correction of Naval Records can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 32 C.F.R. Part 723. There is also an instruction at SECNAVINST 5420.193. The Coast Guard directive is COMDTINST 1071.1.

More board resources are available on ourMilitary Law Resources page.

Call (800) 355-1095 for a free consultation with our experienced BCMR attorneys if you need to appear before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

What You Should Know About Military Record Correction

The law basically permits the Secretary of a military department to correct any military record when necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice. The Secretary acts through the review boards.

The statute of limitations is ordinarily three years; however, the boards have the power to waive the statute of limitations. The boards can also authorize monetary payments where appropriate.

If you have already filed and are contemplating retaining counsel for a request for reconsideration, a free consultation is highly advisable. Ordinarily, the statute of limitations for requests for reconsideration is one year. The boards often demand new argument or new evidence.

Why You Need Experienced Legal Counsel

Having experienced counsel can be extremely beneficial. The various boards receive thousands of applications a year. Some of the boards have significant backlogs that result in some cases taking over a year to resolve.

A Freedom of Information Act Request several years ago revealed that:

  • Navy BCNR members devote an average of less than 2 minutes to deciding each application
  • Army BCMR members devote an average of less than 4 minutes to deciding each application
  • The boards do not require their members to actually review the evidence
  • The boards sometimes rely on summarized written recommendations from staff members before they vote
  • Board members do not necessarily undergo specialized or detailed training. They are not always experts in the law

The implication, of course, is that experienced counsel must be able to distill your facts and arguments into a concise and simple to understand argument for relief.

When contesting unfavorable information before the boards for correction of military records, it is also important to understand their relationship to the federal courts.

Military Review Boards Are Subject to Review

For informational purposes, military review boards - like all other federal agencies - are subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act. The boards understand that the statute - 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) - permits reviewing courts to set aside agency actions, findings, and conclusions that are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.

The difficulty is that courts are "unusually" deferential to the review boards because those boards are given expansive discretion in arriving at decisions. Courts are often reluctant to get involved in routine, day-to-day, administrative decisions. This is why experienced counsel is so important to the review board process.

It is also well-accepted that "government officials must follow their own regulations, even if they are not compelled to have them at all." (See Bond v. US, 47 Fed. Cl. 641, 648 (2000). Experienced counsel with assist you contesting unfavorable information with perspective as to how courts will analyze the issues.

The law requires that the review board "provide an explanation that will enable the court to evaluate the agency's rationale at the time of the decision." Often, the boards are deficient in providing their rationale.

There are other common ways in which review boards are prone to make errors. For those reasons, our free consultation is advisable before applying to the boards for correction of military records.

Schedule your free initial consultation with our BCMR attorneys today by calling (800) 355-1095.

Why Hire Us?

Your Future is Too Important Not To
  • Fast Responses & Free Initial Consultations Available 24 Hours

  • Over 100 Years of Combined Legal Experience

  • Frequent Coverage on High-Profile Media Networks

  • Court-Martial Experience in Every Service & Every Crime

AS FEATURED ON:

  • Vanity Fair
  • Texas Monthly
  • The New Yorker
  • MSNBC
  • People Magazine
  • Wall Street Journal
  • Rolling Stone Magazine
  • Los Angeles Times
  • Navy Times
  • AirForce Times