Article 89 Disrespect Offenses DEFENDING MILITARY MEMBERS WORLDWIDE Contact Us!


Article 89 through 91 create a protected status for superior commissioned officers, noncommissioned officers, and warrant officers in the execution of their duties.


  • That the accused did or omitted certain acts or used certain language to or concerning a certain commissioned officer;
  • That such behavior or language was directed toward that officer;
  • That the officer toward whom the acts, omissions, or words were directed was the superior commissioned officer of the accused;
  • That the accused then knew that the commissioned officer toward whom the acts, omissions, or words were directed was the accused’s superior commissioned officer;
  • That the under the circumstances, the behavior or language was disrespectful to that commissioned officer [1].

Superior Commissioned Officer

One of the first issues to arise in any Article 89 case is whether the allegedly disrespectful acts, omissions or words were directed towards a superior commissioned officer. The statute divides the analysis into two groups – circumstances where the accused is in the same armed force as the superior commissioned officer and circumstances where the accused is in a different armed force than the superior commissioned officer. Generally, this includes commissioned warrant officers.

Under Article 89, when the accused is in the same armed force as the victim disrespected, the superior under the following conditions:

  • If the victim is a commissioned officer superior in rank to the accused.
  • If the victim is superior in command to the accused, even if the victim is subordinate in rank to the accused.
  • If the victims are superior in grade, but inferior in command.

When the victim is a member of a different branch of service, the victim is superior when:

  • The victim is a commissioned officer and superior in the chain of command over the accused.
  • The victim, not a medical officer or chaplain, is senior in grade to the accused and both are detained by a hostile entity so that recourse through the normal chain of command is prevented.

A victim is not a superior commissioned officer simply because he or she is superior in grade to the accused [2].


The statute provides that misconduct on the part of the superior in dealing with a subordinate divests the superior of his or her authority and no longer affords the superior of protected status. The divestiture must be a substantial departure from the required standards of conduct. The divestiture is limited to offenses where the protected status of the victim is an element – but may not extend to lesser included offenses [3]. A jury can also find a partial divestiture. In other words, the victim may not have been in the execution of his office, but he had not divested himself of his rank status [4]. The divestiture is a special defense under the statute and is a question of fact for the panel.

The case law provides a number of examples of divestiture:

  • Striking the accused [5]
  • Challenging the accused to a fight [6]
  • Using racial slurs towards a subordinate [7]
  • Serving as a bartender at an enlisted party [8]
  • Exceeding the scope of a search authorization to embarrass the accused by reading a private letter [9]

Examples of conduct not amounting to divestiture include:

  • General use of profanity[10]
  • General allegations of horseplay [11]
  • Personal relationship with subordinate [12]

Why Hire Daniel Conway & Associates?

  • Frequent Coverage on High-Profile Media Networks
  • Practicing Worldwide With Years of Combined Legal Experience
  • Fast Responses & Free Initial Consultations Available 24 Hours
  • Court-Martial Experience in Every Service & Every Crime
  • Daniel  Conway Photo
    Daniel Conway Partner

    For the better part of the last decade, Mr. Conway has become a nationally recognized resource on military justice. Daniel Conway is a former Marine staff sergeant and captain. He is a proud graduate of the University of Texas at San Antonio and University of New Hampshire School of Law. Mr. Conway is recently a former President of the New Hampshire Bar Association Military Law Section and a current member of the DC Bar. Mr. Conway has also written a book on Military Crimes and Defenses that is near publication with a major ...

    Read More
  • Brian  Pristera Photo
    Brian Pristera Attorney

    A Richmond, Virginia native, Mr. Pristera graduated from Virginia Commonwealth University with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. After spending some time as a DuPont engineer, specifically working on Kevlar manufacturing and ballistics applications, Mr. Pristera attended law school at the University of New Hampshire. On July 4, 2010, Mr. Pristera was commissioned in the U.S. Army in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps. Mr. Pristera spent almost six years on active duty. He spent just over three of those years in criminal defense, ...

    Read More
  • Joseph  Galli Photo
    Joseph Galli Attorney

    Originally from Portland, Maine, Mr. Galli attended Elmira College in New York on a four-year Army ROTC Scholarship. At Elmira, he double majored in Business Administration and Public Affairs. Mr. Galli graduated from Elmira College in 2009 with a Bachelor of Science degree and was Commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the United States Army. Mr. Galli began his study of the law in 2009 at the University of New Hampshire School of Law. There, he focused on litigation and honed his advocacy skills as a member of the Advanced Trial ...

    Read More
  • “Very knowledgeable and helpful”

    - Michael
  • “Unbelievable Results!”

    - Craig
  • “God am I happy I chose this firm to represent me”

    - Connor

Contact Daniel Conway & Associates

Request a Free Initial Consultation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy